The Chattering Class
Many in the chattering class are obsessing over President Biden
and questions about his fitness for office.
At the White House Press Secretary’s briefing yesterday, Karine
Jean-Pierre fielded an hour of questions such as, “Does the President need a
nap every day?” “Why hasn’t he released
ALL of his medical records?” “Why has it
taken him SOOO long to speak to Congressional leaders, hold a press conference,
or waited so long to participate in an unscripted interview?”
Dissatisfied with the administration’s answers, the chattering
class and democratic members of Congress are increasingly calling for Biden to
step down so that … what? They are not
very clear on the “what”. Meanwhile,
they forget that President Biden has already been “out there” during a very
successful Presidency. They forget that
his legislative accomplishments could not have come about without significant
public and private engagement by the President of Congress, American
power-brokers, foreign leaders, and the American people. Engagement that the chattering class now
complains is missing. Biden has already
proven he can do all the things the chattering class now say he cannot.
According to David
Rothkopf, writing in The Daily Beast, “Is it fair to judge a man of
demonstrated strengths and massive achievements by a few off moments that all
people who are aging encounter? Perhaps not. But it is a political reality with
which Joe Biden, the White House, the Democratic Party and the country are
desperately and appropriately grappling right now.” Why, however, are we grappling with it when
the preponderance of evidence should lead us to a different conclusion?
Meanwhile, Donald Trump’s
take on the Supreme Court’s immunity decision, claiming complete vindication
and demanding that all criminal cases against him be dismissed, gets only
passing mention. He increasingly uses
the Supreme Court’s decision to justify his authoritarian and lawless plans
should he be reelected. His speech is
increasingly incoherent giving rise to consistently questionable behavior. Yet, more and more, Trump’s unfitness
receives scant coverage because, “Trump is unfit but we have seen it all
before.” Why, however, are we failing to
grapple with it when the preponderance of evidence should lead us to a
different conclusion?
The best way to evaluate
Trump’s fitness is to evaluate him in light of his opponent; a man of character,
skill, and accomplishment. Replacing
President Biden with a younger, physically fitter Democratic candidate will not
help us gain any better insight into the threat posed by a second Trump
Presidency.
Comments
Post a Comment